On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 11:59 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2022-05-27 11:48:45 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > I find it hard to believe that there wasn't even a cursory effort at
> > performance validation before this was committed, but that's what it
> > looks like.
>
> Yea. Imo this pretty clearly should be reverted. It has correctness issues,
> testing issues and we don't know whether it does anything useful.
It should definitely be reverted.
--
Peter Geoghegan