Re: Pass heaprel to GlobalVisTestFor() in vacuumRedirectAndPlaceholder()
| От | Peter Geoghegan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Pass heaprel to GlobalVisTestFor() in vacuumRedirectAndPlaceholder() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAH2-Wz=jGryxWm74G1khSt0zNPUNhezYJnvSjNo2t3Jswtb8ww@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Pass heaprel to GlobalVisTestFor() in vacuumRedirectAndPlaceholder() ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:09 AM Drouvot, Bertrand <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > Right. Please find enclosed V2 also taking care of BTPageIsRecyclable() > and _bt_pendingfsm_finalize(). Pushed that as too separate patches just now. Thanks. BTW, I'm not overly happy about the extent of the changes to nbtree from commit 61b313e4. I understand that it was necessary to pass down a heaprel in a lot of places, which is bound to create a lot of churn. However, a lot of the churn from the commit seems completely avoidable. There is no reason why the BT_READ path in _bt_getbuf() could possibly require a valid heaprel. In fact, most individual BT_WRITE calls don't need heaprel, either -- only those that pass P_NEW. The changes affecting places like _bt_mkscankey() and _bt_metaversion() seem particularly bad. Anyway, I'll take care of this myself at some point after feature freeze. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: