Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=OeXgWHc47QzVwhrGKx8=-9wu1EO3q6AgiGdijjKaZHA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:46 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yeah, if we wanted to expose these complications more directly, we
> could think about adding or changing the main counters.  I was wondering
> about whether we should have it report "x bytes and y line pointers
> freed", rather than counting tuples per se.

I like that idea, but I'm pretty sure that there are very few users
that are aware of these distinctions at all. It would be a good idea
to clearly document them.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Следующее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Status of the table access method work