Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=5Sd22FxLtj_Hgd5pWaGJj7Nyh2SUXxiQcnqQ+3C2cRQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Attached patch fixes that.  Thom, your example query should not error out
> with the patch.  As discussed here, DO UPDATE cannot be supported at the
> moment.

Maybe you should just let infer_arbiter_indexes() fail, rather than
enforcing this directly. IIRC, that's what happens with
inheritance-based partitioning.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test