Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=2GDms4mBm2JxM8ysC9fmNCBGxLKAGK0a+JoOtUvKASA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The tag is applied, though for some reason the pgsql-committers auto
> e-mail about new tags hasn't been working lately.

Thanks. FWIW I did get the automated email shortly after you sent this email.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DROP relation IF EXISTS Docs and Tests - Bug Fix