On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2. For BRIN/UPDATE+INIT, block numbers (in rm_tid[0]) are different in
>> REVMAP page. This happens only for two cases. I'm not sure what the
>> reason can be.
>
> Hm? This smells like a block reference bug. What are the cases you are
> referring to?
>
Following is the only case where the backup page stored in the wal
record and the current page after redo are not consistent.
test:BRIN using gmake-check
Master
-----------------------------------------
STATEMENT: VACUUM brintest;
LOG: INSERT @ 0/59E1E0F8: - BRIN/UPDATE+INIT: heapBlk 100
pagesPerRange 1 old offnum 11, new offnum 1
Standby
----------------------------------------------
LOG: REDO @ 0/59E1B500; LSN 0/59E1E0F8: prev 0/59E17578; xid 0; len
14; blkref #0: rel 1663/16384/30556, blk 12; blkref #1: rel
1663/16384/30556, blk 1; blkref #2: rel 1663/16384/30556, blk 2 -
BRIN/UPDATE+INIT: heapBlk 100 pagesPerRange 1 old offnum 11, new
offnum 1
WARNING: Inconsistent page (at byte 26) found, rel 1663/16384/30556,
forknum 0, blkno 1
CONTEXT: xlog redo at 0/59E1B500 for BRIN/UPDATE+INIT: heapBlk 100
pagesPerRange 1 old offnum 11, new offnum 1
thoughts?
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com