On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> pg_basebackup/ with fe_recvint64() has its own way to do things, as
>>> does the large object things in libpq. I would think that at least on
>>> HEAD things could be gathered with a small set of routines. It is
>>> annoying to have a third copy of the same thing. OK that's not
>>> invasive but src/common/ would be a nice place to put things.
>>>
>>> - if (PQgetlength(res, 0, 1) != sizeof(int32))
>>> + if (PQgetlength(res, 0, 1) != sizeof(long long int))
>>> This had better be int64.
>>
>> Thank you. I'll do the changes and submit the revised patch. I've
>> added an entry in commitfest for the same.
>
> Yeah... I was halfway into writing a patch myself. As it seems that
> you are planning to submit a new version, and because it won't be nice
> to step on your toes, I'll wait for your updated version.
>
I've not yet started the patch and it may take some time for me to
understand and write
the patch in a correct way. Since, you've almost written the patch,
IMHO, please go ahead
and submit the patch. I'll happily review and test it. :-)
Thanks for the notes.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com