Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kuntal Ghosh
Тема Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows
Дата
Msg-id CAGz5QC+1or3m-yQxdG4k8VW8bb12TZuGOEcJ3Do5Q5rhbrdPGA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Ответы Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> Kuntal Ghosh wrote:
> [pg_test_fsync doesn't use pgwin32_open and hence doesn't respect O_DSYNC]
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 09:58:34AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> > > > One another alternative could be that we
>> > > > define open as pgwin32_open (for WIN32) wherever we need it.
>> > >
>> > > Which is what basically happens on any *nix platform, are you foreseeing
>> > > anything bad here?
>> >
>> > Nothing apparent, but I think we should try to find out why at the first
>> > place this has been made backend specific.
>>
>> It seems the "#ifndef FRONTEND" restriction was added around
>> pgwin32_open() for building libpq with Visual C++ or Borland C++.  The
>> restriction was added in commit 422d4819 to build libpq with VC++[1].
>> Later, in commit fd7c3f67e0bc4, the support for Borland C++ was also
>> added.
>>
>> So, I'm not sure whether removing that restriction will work for all
>> front-end modules.
>
> Thanks for the research, and sorry for my long silence.
>
> If I remove the "#ifndef FRONTEND", building with MSVC fails for all
> call sites that use the two-argument version of open(2).
>
> If I use the three-argument version throughout, which should be no problem,
> PostgreSQL builds just fine with MSVC.
>
I don't have enough experience on MSVC/Windows to comment on the same.

> How about checking what the buildfarm thinks about the attached?
+1


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key
Следующее
От: Kuntal Ghosh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Incorrect fsync handling in pg_basebackup's tar_finish