Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kuntal Ghosh
Тема Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG
Дата
Msg-id CAGz5QC+0-dPU1Ggf7121ePbEOyV9nAt2veZv+Tu3dSsqXmhvNg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG
Список pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> Previous 002 patch lacked to add describing PREPARE TRANSACTION.
>> Attached updated 002 patch.
>
> I just committed both patches and a backport of the bug fix itself.
> Thanks again for finding and fixing.
Regression tests for sql/twophase is failing while performing the test
with make installcheck.
+ [NO_PID]: ecpg_check_PQresult on line 32: bad response - ERROR:
prepared transactions are disabled
+ HINT:  Set max_prepared_transactions to a nonzero value.

Setting max_prepared_transactions accordingly fixes the issue. But,
I'm not sure whether this test should be performed by installcheck by
default or should only be performed by make
installcheck-prepared-txns.

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG