Re: JDBC behaviour

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sridhar N Bamandlapally
Тема Re: JDBC behaviour
Дата
Msg-id CAGuFTBXf_1Vws=Ja3nCqvRGvWPE2W4ATpCyxrreCgWFi0Yii=w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: JDBC behaviour  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>)
Ответы Re: JDBC behaviour  (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>)
Re: JDBC behaviour  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
Дерево обсуждения
setAutoCommit(false), it should not be treating all next transactions as single set, simple, this is what expected behavior

 

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com> wrote:
På torsdag 18. februar 2016 kl. 09:51:47, skrev Sridhar N Bamandlapally <sridhar.bn1@gmail.com>:
Ok, let me put this way
 
in JDBC we have setAutoCommit( false ) , and all dmls are independent transactions
 
and when any transaction fails then the session not allowing next transactions
 
in Java when we do setAutoCommit( false ) its behaving like all transactions in BEGIN-END block, this is not expected behavior
 
i guess this is bug
 
No, you got it backwards. With autocommit=false all statements are NOT independent transactions.
 
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
 

Вложения

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JDBC behaviour
Следующее
От: Vladimir Sitnikov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JDBC behaviour