Re: [HACKERS] Online DW

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sridhar N Bamandlapally
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Online DW
Дата
Msg-id CAGuFTBU8HvK7jT4oZQEYwqW0PKz5fiJA6AkUZzo_0PH23av4FA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Online DW  (Sridhar N Bamandlapally <sridhar.bn1@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Online DW  (Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>)
Список pgsql-general

One thing we can restrict to "begin noarchive" transaction block are DELETE and SELECT only

Sridhar
Opentext

On 10 Jun 2016 21:57, "Sridhar N Bamandlapally" <sridhar.bn1@gmail.com> wrote:

This is what I feel will give me solution to maintain production (current+7days) and archive(current+history) without any etl/scheduler

But there is no feature available in any database

Sridhar
Opentext

On 10 Jun 2016 19:03, "Craig Ringer" <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 10 June 2016 at 18:56, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
On 6/10/2016 2:18 AM, Sridhar N Bamandlapally wrote:
This/These will be performed in Production to clean-up archive which will not be sync with Archive/DW DB only

one heads-up is Archive/DW DB may need to build WITHOUT CONSTRAINTS

May need to introduce ARCHIVE system/tag in pg_hba.conf

there's a whole lot of implied magic here unless you want to get way more specific what these features do, exactly, under all possible conditions.

I'd go further than that and say I can't see how something like this could possibly work with physical (block based) replication. It's total hand-waving.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Sridhar N Bamandlapally
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Online DW
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: What is the general opinion on use of tablespaces