Re: pg_dump needs SELECT privileges on irrelevant extension table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jacob Champion
Тема Re: pg_dump needs SELECT privileges on irrelevant extension table
Дата
Msg-id CAGu=u8jcD1DuazVmo9JoLe9jEwp7WnVncUEiagNaG-tpKEZ5uw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dump needs SELECT privileges on irrelevant extension table  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pg_dump needs SELECT privileges on irrelevant extension table  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 1:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > This change would mean that policies added by a user after the extension
> > is created would just be lost by a pg_dump/reload, doesn't it?
>
> Yes.  But I'd say that's unsupported, just like making other ad-hoc
> changes to extension objects is unsupported (and the effects will be
> lost on dump/reload).  We specifically have support for user-added
> ACLs, and that's good, but don't claim that we have support for
> doing the same with policies.

Is this approach backportable?

(Adding Aleks to CC -- Timescale may want to double-check that the new
proposal still works for them.)

Thanks,
--Jacob



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Show version of OpenSSL in ./configure output
Следующее
От: Isaac Morland
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL domains and NOT NULL constraint