Re: BUG #16140: View with INSERT, DO INSTEAD, and ON CONFLICT causesan error

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bryan DiCarlo
Тема Re: BUG #16140: View with INSERT, DO INSTEAD, and ON CONFLICT causesan error
Дата
Msg-id CAGo_416nUxAa4WAHgLn3ZCryqvM-RL7_O9QkyUFBhqn24hZ38g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16140: View with INSERT, DO INSTEAD, and ON CONFLICT causes an error  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Thanks Tom,

I changed it to EXCLUDED and it's working.

Thanks again.

Cheers,

Bryan


On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 10:26 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> When creating an updatable "complex" view, if an ON CONFLICT clause is
> provided, an INSERT SELECT to that view will cause "ERROR: variable not
> found in subplan target lists".  Removing the ON CONFLICT clause eliminates
> the error message.

I believe the problem is that you wrote the ON CONFLICT clause
incorrectly:

>   ON CONFLICT (slo_id, time_window, tags) DO UPDATE SET value = NEW.value

You should have written "EXCLUDED.value" not "NEW.value".  There is
a bug here, but it's that the parser accepted this rule.   I'm guessing
that the parsing logic for ON CONFLICT didn't consider the possibility
that NEW and OLD for a rule would already be in the range table.

                        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16140: View with INSERT, DO INSTEAD, and ON CONFLICT causes an error
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Failed assertion clauses != NIL