On 25.07.24 13:09, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> However, if there is no more disaster threshold at 2^31, what is the >> guidance for setting these? Or more radically, why even run >> transaction-count-based vacuum at all? > > To allow the CLOG to be truncated. There's no disaster anymore, but > without freezing, the clog will grow indefinitely.
Maybe a setting similar to max_wal_size could be better for that?