Re: TOAST versus toast
| От | wenhui qiu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: TOAST versus toast |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAGjGUA+aPxvyW1a7bzpqTD0EUaLRfTYNqR+wWNt5DjvpUcZ1hg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: TOAST versus toast ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi，
I think this point is of no significance at all. Besides, this is a document that has been around for over ten years. Everyone has become accustomed to this kind of expression. This is just a case of being full but having nothing to do with anything.
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 at 10:31, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 8:33 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks for your suggestions. At this point option (1) is looking most
attractive. Probably, I will just withdraw the CF entry soon unless
there is some new interest. Just chipping away fixing a few places
isn't going to achieve the consistency this thread was aiming for.I've moved this back to waiting on author pending a final decision. Interested parties might still chime in but it doesn't seem like it is actively looking for reviewers at this point.David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: