Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization
| От | Koen De Groote |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAGbX52FOoZqokruugT2DhhQFc7ME-BJWjTTZq6q4JsGzO0Ytmg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Number 2 would be perfect, I think. It leaves no doubt at all.
Regards,
Koen De Groote
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 9:32 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 17:22 +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> It seems to me the same clarification could be achieved just by adding
> 1 word ("PostgreSQL") to the original text. e.g.
>
> BEFORE
> Logical replication of a table typically starts with taking a snapshot
> of the data on the publisher database and copying that to the
> subscriber.
>
> AFTER #1 (I added "PostgreSQL")
> Logical replication of a table typically starts with PostgreSQL taking
> a snapshot of the data on the publisher database and copying that to
> the subscriber.
+1 on this version. Either this way or the way I suggested, it doesn't
matter as far as I am concerned.
Perhaps Koen wants to chime in and say what sounds best to him.
> Or, AFTER #2 (I added "PostgreSQL internally")
> Logical replication of a table typically starts with PostgreSQL
> internally taking a snapshot of the data on the publisher database and
> copying that to the subscriber.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: