On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:36 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I can look into doing 3, that *might* get rid of the need to do that
>> initial FSM vacuum, but all other intermediate vacuums are still
>> needed.
>
> Understood. So how about that this patch focuses only make FSM vacuum
> more frequently and leaves the initial FSM vacuum and the handling
> cancellation cases? The rest can be a separate patch.
Ok.
Attached split patches. All but the initial FSM pass is in 1, the
initial FSM pass as in the original patch is in 2.
I will post an alternative patch for 2 when/if I have one. In the
meanwhile, we can talk about 1.