On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, the 64x increase may be justifiable in absolute terms: it's not
> unlikely that a 16MB buffer will be evicted from the OS cache before
> vacuum is done with it, even in heavily throttled vacuums.
Sorry, that should read "It's not *likely* that a 16MB buffer will be evicted"