Re: Can we trust fsync?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Claudio Freire
Тема Re: Can we trust fsync?
Дата
Msg-id CAGTBQpaU6ByOzrQTLBvD5mYq8RQm94RSic7Af794Djghg2tbYQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Can we trust fsync?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The original mail was referencing a problem with syncing *meta* data
>> though. The semantics around meta data syncs are much less clearly
>> specified, in part because file systems traditionally made nearly all meta
>> data operations synchronous. Doing plug-pull testing on Postgres would not
>> test meta data syncing very well since Postgres specifically avoids doing
>> much meta data operations by overwriting existing files and blocks as much
>> as possible.
>
> True.  You're better off with a specialized testing program.  (Though
> now you mention it, I wonder whether that program was stressing metadata
> or not.)


You can always stress metadata by leaving atime updates in their full
setting (whatever it is for that filesystem).



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Building on S390
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block