Re: NUMA packaging and patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Claudio Freire
Тема Re: NUMA packaging and patch
Дата
Msg-id CAGTBQpZC9rLMQ1fnNnTyA-v9TC_=Wu9VW3-i6PCj7aGru-08Jg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: NUMA packaging and patch  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Ответы Re: NUMA packaging and patch
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> One thing I concern is, it may conflict with numa-balancing
> features that is supported in the recent Linux kernel; that
> migrates physical pages according to the location of tasks
> which references the page beyond the numa zone.
> # I'm not sure whether it is applied on shared memory region.
> # Please correct me if I misunderstood. But it looks to me
> # physical page in shared memory is also moved.
>
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/summit2014_riel_chegu_w_0340_automatic_numa_balancing_0.pdf


Sadly, it excludes the OS cache explicitly (when it mentions libc.so),
which is one of the hottest sources of memory bandwidth consumption in
a database.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bad estimation together with largework_mem generates terrible slow hash joins
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: What's the point of json_extract_path_op etc?