On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It looks like we could support
>
> CREATE TABLE t1 (c int[] REFERENCES BY ELEMENT t2);
>
> but (1) this doesn't seem terribly intelligible to me, and
> (2) I don't see how we modify that if we want to provide
> at-least-one-match semantics later.
What about something more generic?
CREATE TABLE <tname> ( <cname> <type> [(<expr>)] REFERENCES <t2name>
[(<t2expr>)] )
Meaning, if <expr> is missing, it's taken <expr> = <cname>, if not,
it's the result of that expression the one that references the target
table.
Sounds crazy, but with ALL() and ANY() it ought to support lots of subcases.