Re: xfs perform a lot better than ext4 [WAS: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Claudio Freire
Тема Re: xfs perform a lot better than ext4 [WAS: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance]
Дата
Msg-id CAGTBQpYtN3a=ryQOcGyZPNYz4Ts=Fbj395thp7Ss3GHQqSQi3g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: xfs perform a lot better than ext4 [WAS: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance]  (Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> wrote:
> I thought that postgreSQL did its own journalling, if that is the proper
> term, so why not use an ext2 file system to lower overhead?

Because you can still have metadata-level corruption.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jean-David Beyer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: xfs perform a lot better than ext4 [WAS: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance]
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: xfs perform a lot better than ext4 [WAS: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance]