Re: 57 minute SELECT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Claudio Freire
Тема Re: 57 minute SELECT
Дата
Msg-id CAGTBQpYdss9oZykcB46zhBBgN+gVCX=8mj2=iciwFywtsHfNqg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 57 minute SELECT  (Samuel Stearns <sstearns@staff.iinet.net.au>)
Ответы Re: 57 minute SELECT  (Samuel Stearns <sstearns@staff.iinet.net.au>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Samuel Stearns
<sstearns@staff.iinet.net.au> wrote:
> Thanks, Claudio:
>
> http://explain.depesz.com/s/WJQx

If you have a test database, and if it doesn't hurt other queries of
course, try clustering on the ip index.

I believe your problem is that the index isn't helping much, it's
probably hurting you in fact. If you cluster over ip, however, the
scan will go almost sequentially, and there will be no wasted bytes in
the pages fetched, which will be much friendlier on your I/O
subsystem.

If I were in your shoes, I'd cluster each of the monthly tables as
they become inactive.


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Samuel Stearns
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 57 minute SELECT
Следующее
От: Samuel Stearns
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 57 minute SELECT