Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Дата
Msg-id CAGRY4nwOdCqBnzh8BkLJNG5gY-jQvTuV9aJf28W1TOe1yMmqUg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 07:04, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> I'd feel better about it if the mechanism had you specify exactly
> one target process, and were restricted to a superuser requestor.

Er, rather. I actually assumed the former was the case already, not
having looked closely yet.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16663: DROP INDEX did not free up disk space: idle connection hold file marked as deleted
Следующее
От: Krunal Bauskar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.