Re: Buffer Requests Trace

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Lucas Lersch
Тема Re: Buffer Requests Trace
Дата
Msg-id CAGR3jZCDYJKm97-H5pHn7Hg-Vt0YjuudrEFhVO_GociE5Pwu5g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Buffer Requests Trace  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: Buffer Requests Trace
Список pgsql-hackers
Aren't heap and index requests supposed to go through the shared buffers anyway?

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
* Lucas Lersch (lucaslersch@gmail.com) wrote:
> shared_buffers is 128MB and the version of pgsql is 9.3.5

I suspect you're not tracking what you think you're tracking, which is
why I brought up shared_buffers.

~14k * 8192 (page size) = ~110MB

What it sounds like you're actually tracking are shared buffer requests
and not heap or index requests.

Now, perhaps the test you're running only touched 110MB of the 6G
database, but that seems pretty unlikely.

        Thanks,

                Stephen



--
Lucas Lersch

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Expose options to explain? (track_io_timing)
Следующее
От: Marco Nenciarini
Дата:
Сообщение: [RFC] Incremental backup v3: incremental PoC