[HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rushabh Lathia
Тема [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)
Дата
Msg-id CAGPqQf3joLrjmR2FmQzYURb-_TxhW78tXhgYm+C66wXNjWH9ww@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commitid: 69f4b9c85f)  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commitid: 69f4b9c85f)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Consider the below test;

CREATE TABLE tab ( a int primary key);

SELECT  *
FROM pg_constraint pc,
CAST(CASE WHEN pc.contype IN ('f','u','p') THEN generate_series(1, array_upper(pc.conkey, 1)) ELSE NULL END AS int) AS position;

Above query is failing with "set-valued function called in context that cannot
accept a set". But if I remove the CASE from the query then it working just good.

Like:

SELECT  * 
FROM pg_constraint pc,
CAST(generate_series(1, array_upper(pc.conkey, 1)) AS int) AS position;

This started failing with 69f4b9c85f168ae006929eec44fc44d569e846b9. It seems
check_srf_call_placement() sets the hasTargetSRFs flag and but when the SRFs
at the rtable ofcourse this flag doesn't get set. It seems like missing something
their, but I might be completely wrong as not quire aware of this area.




regards,
Rushabh Lathia

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Speedup twophase transactions