Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rushabh Lathia
Тема Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit
Дата
Msg-id CAGPqQf1dZLsitVwqJ3SChXJ1rJYjXwUCKu5n_n5ToqppATfQBw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 2:45 PM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've not looked at your patch deeply but if this problem is talking
> only about postgres_fdw I think we should improve postgres_fdw, not
> adding a GUC to the core. It’s not that all FDW plugins use connection
> cache and postgres_fdw’s connection cache is implemented within
> postgres_fdw, I think we should focus on improving postgres_fdw. I
> also think it’s not a good design that the core manages connections to
> remote servers connected via FDW. I wonder if we can add a
> postgres_fdw option for this purpose, say keep_connection [on|off].
> That way, we can set it per server so that remote connections to the
> particular server don’t remain idle.
>

If I understand it correctly, your suggestion is to add
keep_connection option and use that while defining the server object.
IMO having keep_connection option at the server object level may not
serve the purpose being discussed here.
For instance, let's say I create a foreign server in session 1 with
keep_connection on, and I want to use that
server object in session 2 with keep_connection off and session 3 with
keep_connection on and so on.

In my opinion, in such cases, one needs to create two server object one with
keep-connection ON and one with keep-connection off.  And need to decide
to use appropriate for the particular session.
 
One way we can change the server's keep_connection option is to alter
the server object, but that's not a good choice,
as we have to alter it at the system level.

Overall, though we define the server object in a single session, it
will be used in multiple sessions, having an
option at the per-server level would not be a good idea.

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com




--
Rushabh Lathia

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
Следующее
От: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [patch] demote