On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 20:08, Jacob Champion
<jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I hit this on my machine. With the attached diff I can reproduce
> constantly (including with the most recent test patch); I think the
> cancel must be arriving between the bind/execute steps?
Nice find! Your explanation makes total sense. Attached a patchset
that fixes/works around this issue by using the simple query protocol
in the cancel test.