Re: Use "protocol options" name instead of "protocol extensions" everywhere

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jelte Fennema-Nio
Тема Re: Use "protocol options" name instead of "protocol extensions" everywhere
Дата
Msg-id CAGECzQQ7a+OHrf9KKUPXSNS9tE-C79eV9o+BQPQh4q5aY7qMDg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Use "protocol options" name instead of "protocol extensions" everywhere  (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>)
Ответы Re: Use "protocol options" name instead of "protocol extensions" everywhere
Re: Use "protocol options" name instead of "protocol extensions" everywhere
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 18:15, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 15:50, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> > Bikeshedding time:
>
> Another few options:

Okay let's just pick one of the available options. The current
situation where we use different terminology for the same thing across
the docs is definitely confusing, so let's change that. The proposed
options for the names are:

1. Protocol option
2. Protocol extension
3. Optional protocol feature
4. Protocol enhancement
5. Protocol flag
6. Protocol feature-flag
7. Protocol configuration
8. Protocol parameter

My personal preference from most to least preferred are as follows,
but I could live with any of them:

- 1
- 8
- 2
- 7
- everything else

(if we go for "protocol extension" then the patch should be updated to
include a section that clarifies that protocol extensions have nothing
to do with CREATE EXTENSION)



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: