Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped
От | Josef Šimánek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFp7QwqhtSXiWYDd9D+F1nAR7VdChWE7Zx+NWsR6ZRS5Gg2BWQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
po 3. 3. 2025 v 10:05 odesílatel Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> napsal: > > > > On 2025/01/10 23:50, jian he wrote: > > hi. > > seems no regress tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped. > > > > CopyFrom > > pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_COPY_TUPLES_SKIPPED, > > cstate->num_errors); > > > > there is coverage for it. but in regress test, we didn't really print > > out this value (cstate->num_errors) > > > > The attached patch did minor changes on src/test/regress/sql/copy.sql. > > so we can check if pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_COPY_TUPLES_SKIPPED..) > > is working as intended or not. > > Thanks for the patch! > > The patch basically looks good to me. > I’ve made some minor cosmetic adjustments — the updated patch is attached. > > Unless there are any objections, I'm thinking to commit it. Looks good to me. > Regards, > > -- > Fujii Masao > Advanced Computing Technology Center > Research and Development Headquarters > NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: