On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:44 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, as far as I know, it's up to me which parts of your emails I want to
> quote in my reply. I did read this part. It did not change my opinion. My
> fundamental objection to your proposal is that I think it is too wordy. I
> think users will generally know whether they are using partitioning or
> inheritance, and if they don't it's not hard to figure out. I don't think
> quoting only part of what you wrote made the quote misleading, but it did
> allow me to express my opinion.
I would usually believe that people have read complete email before
replying. But when the reply raises a question without quoting a
portion of my mail which I think has the answer, I am confused.
There's no straight forward method to avoid that confusion given it's
written and turn based communication. But I try to get clarity on that
confusion.
> I understand that you don't agree, which is
> fine, but I stand by my position.
>
I am fine with disagreement, now that I know why there's disagreement.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company