Re: [HACKERS] Foreign Join pushdowns not working properly for outer joins

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Bapat
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Foreign Join pushdowns not working properly for outer joins
Дата
Msg-id CAFjFpRfSJjN-sZ-j-3wGo8cTgu5x3h_7DfxHYwm8W6WqJLexAA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Foreign Join pushdowns not working properly for outerjoins  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 4/24/17 22:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 4/14/17 00:24, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>>> This looks better. Here are patches for master and 9.6.
>>> Since join pushdown was supported in 9.6 the patch should be
>>> backported to 9.6 as well. Attached is the patch (_96) for 9.6,
>>> created by rebasing on 9.6 branch and removing conflict. _v6 is
>>> applicable on master.
>>
>> Committed to PG10.  I'll work on backpatching next.
>
> For backpatching to 9.6, I came up with the attached reduced version.
> Since we don't have add_foreign_grouping_paths() in 9.6, we can omit the
> refactoring and keep the changes much simpler.  Does that make sense?

Looks good to me.

There's minor complaint. In case we change the option related
functions in master because of a bug, backpatching those changes to
9.6 may not be straightforward. There's very less chance that we will
require to change those functions, so may be we can take that
theoretical risk.
-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Abbas Butt
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PG_TRY & PG_CATCH in FDW development
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning