On 2015-08-05 AM 06:11, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Amit Langote > <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> On 2015-08-03 PM 09:24, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >>> For postgres_fdw it's a boolean server-level option 'twophase_compliant' >>> (suggestions for name welcome). >>> >> >> How about just 'twophase'? > > How about two_phase_commit? >
Much cleaner, +1
I was more inclined to use an adjective, since it's a property of server, instead of a noun. But two_phase_commit looks fine as well, included in the patch attached.
Attached patch addresses all the concerns and suggestions from previous mails in this mail thread.
--
Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company