Re: Push down more UPDATEs/DELETEs in postgres_fdw

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Bapat
Тема Re: Push down more UPDATEs/DELETEs in postgres_fdw
Дата
Msg-id CAFjFpReRgjtor3LimMpEwGkV=GEiL_uJp_f+CMcmmFLPBS23uA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Push down more UPDATEs/DELETEs in postgres_fdw  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Push down more UPDATEs/DELETEs in postgres_fdw
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2016/11/15 19:04, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Fujita-san for working on this. I've signed up to review this
>> patch.
>
>
> Thank you for reviewing the patch!
>
>> Your latest patch doesn't not get apply cleanly apply on master branch.
>
>
> Did you apply the patch set in [1] (postgres-fdw-subquery-support-v4.patch
> and postgres-fdw-phv-pushdown-v4.patch in this order) before applying the
> latest patch?
>

I don't see any reason why DML/UPDATE pushdown should depend upon
subquery deparsing or least PHV patch. Combined together they can help
in more cases, but without those patches, we will be able to push-down
more stuff. Probably, we should just restrict push-down only for the
cases when above patches are not needed. That makes reviews easy. Once
those patches get committed, we may add more functionality depending
upon the status of this patch. Does that make sense?

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Kirkwood
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Следующее
От: Mithun Cy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.