Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Bapat
Тема Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join
Дата
Msg-id CAFjFpRe72byqheTWkfryG37_VouwYwDFT6vmcNBhfD0+_yFLqw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi Ashutosh,
>
> On 2018/05/14 20:14, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> 0001-Hash-partition-bound-equality-refactoring.patch
>> 0002-Targetlist-of-a-child-join-is-produced-by-translatin.patch
>> 0003-Partition-wise-join-for-1-1-1-0-0-1-partition-matchi.patch
>> 0004-Add-a-debug-message-to-notify-whether-partition-wise.patch
>> 0005-Tests-for-0-1-1-1-and-1-0-partition-matching.patch
>> 0006-Extra-extensive-tests-for-advanced-partition-matchin.patch
>
> I noticed after *cleanly* applying 0001-0004 to today's HEAD that while
> 0005's test all pass, there are many failures in 0006's tests.  Maybe, you
> need to adjust something in one of the patches or adjust test outputs.

If the failures are because of plan changes, it's expected. If those
are because of crashes or changed output, those need to be fixed. I
have kept that patch to notice any crashes or output changes, in which
case, I pull that test into 0005 test set after fixing the code. Once
we are near commit, I will remove that patch from the patchset.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: ssl_library parameter