Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Bapat
Тема Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Дата
Msg-id CAFjFpRd7ddjL+8VnTju6Ybj17LeibF_pXsfmY-u-LzkXf47DeQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers




Any distributed transaction management requires 2PC in some or other form. So, we should implement 2PC for FDW keeping in mind various forms of 2PC used practically. Use that infrastructure to build XTM like capabilities for restricted postgres_fdw uses. Previously, I have requested the authors of XTM to look at my patch and provide me feedback about their requirements for implementing 2PC part of XTM. But I have not heard anything from them.


Sorry, may be I missed some message. but I have not received request from you to provide feedback concerning your patch.


See my mail on 31st August on hackers in the thread with subject "Horizontal scalability/sharding".

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company




--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Erroneous cost estimation for nested loop join
Следующее
От: YUriy Zhuravlev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Some questions about the array.