On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> The table of Pseudo-Types needs to be updated as well with unknown in
>>>> datatype.sgml.
>>
>>> Check.
>>
>> Here's an updated patch with doc changes. Aside from that one,
>> I tried to spell "pseudo-type" consistently, and I changed one
>> place where we were calling something a pseudo-type that isn't.
>
> Thanks for the updated version, all the comments have been addressed.
> You have left a lot of code comments using "pseudotype" instead of
> "pseudo-type" in the code. I am guessing that this is on purpose,
> which is fine for me. There is no point to make back-patching more
> complicated for just that.
>
> The CF app has been updated to ready for committer for the record.
I have listed myself as reviewer for this commitfest entry and I am
yet to review the patch. Can you please wait for the listed reviewers,
esp. when those reviewers are active, for changing the commitfest
entry status?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company