Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRC_ZUixbsoaJpGTuaDZO_Tx-hq8OwPS7DvBSSGePBGwdQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
<p dir="ltr">Hi<p dir="ltr">> index 2e7f1d7..d983a50 100644<br /> > --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c<br
/>> +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c<br /> > @@ -4933,6 +4933,11 @@ sigusr1_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS)<br />
>        if (XLogArchivingAlways())<br /> >             PgArchPID = pgarch_start();<br /> ><br /> > +#ifdef
USE_SYSTEMD<br/> > +       if (!EnableHotStandby)<br /> > +           sd_notify(0, "READY=1");<br /> >
+#endif<br/> > +<br /> >         pmState = PM_RECOVERY;<br /> >     }<br /> >     if
(CheckPostmasterSignal(PMSIGNAL_BEGIN_HOT_STANDBY)&&<br /> ><p dir="ltr">I cannot to check it this week, but
thisshould to work. "ready" state for standby only mode starting when slave is able to get wal records or segments from
server.I will test it next week.<p dir="ltr">regards<p dir="ltr">Pavel<br /><p dir="ltr">> > Default timeout on
FCis 90 sec - it is should not to be enough for<br /> > > large servers with large shared buffers and high
checkpointsegments. It<br /> > > should be mentioned in service file.<br /> ><br /> > Good point.  I think
weshould set TimeoutSec=0 in the suggested service file.<br /> ><br /> 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Fix KNN GiST ordering type