On 3/25/19 3:50 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > po 25. 3. 2019 v 8:38 odesílatel David Steele <david@pgmasters.net > <mailto:david@pgmasters.net>> napsal: > > On 3/10/19 8:39 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > Here is pragma patch with demo > We're still not getting real review for this patch and Andrew seems as > skeptical as anyone that this is the right way to go. > > I'm planning to mark it as rejected at the end of this CF. > > > I hope so Andrew will have some time to review this patch
As discussed above, I have marked this patch as rejected. It appears that a more general purpose approach is required to get a consensus on this feature.
I have to accepted this decision. I cannot to write this patch more general - it's absolute generic (or I didn't understand objections).
I agree so now, there are higher priorities, and there are not customers for this patch. But from syntax, semantic perspective, this patch is correct. Now, it is interesting for plpgsql_check users, and their voice was not here, unfortunately. I cannot do more in this area.