Hello
2013/7/1 ian link <ian@ilink.io>:
> Not sure about all of your suggestions. Let me see if I can clarify what
> you're looking for.
>
>>
>> * simply decision if content should be stored in history or not,
>
> Do you mean that the user should use a flag to place the result of a query
> into the history?
> like:
> --ans SELECT * FROM cities...
> Not sure if that's what you mean, but it seems kind of unnecesary. They can
> just hit the \ans flag beforehand.
switching off on is not user friendly
but maybe some interactive mode should be usefull - so after
execution, and showing result, will be prompt if result should be
saved or not.
some like:
\ans interactive
> SELECT * FROM pg_proc;
**** result ****
should be saved last result [y, n]?
> y
result is saved in :ans22
>
>
>> * simply remove last entry (table) of history
>
> That could be useful. What do you think Maciej?
yes, lot of queries is just +/- experiment and you don't would store result
>
>> * queries should be joined to content, only name is not enough
>
> Don't know what you mean. Could you try re-wording that?
>
yes, the names :ans01, :ans02, ... miss semantics - How I can join
this name (and content) with some SQL query?
I needs to reverese search in SQL of stored caches, and I need a information
ans01 SELECT * FROM pg_proc
ans02 SELECT * FROM ans02 WHERE ...
ans03 ...
Regards
Pavel
> Ian
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I am not sure, this interface is really user friendly
>>
>> there is not possible "searching" in history, and not every query push
>> to history some interesting content.
>>
>> It require:
>>
>> * simply decision if content should be stored in history or not,
>> * simply remove last entry (table) of history
>> * queries should be joined to content, only name is not enough
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> 2013/6/28 Maciej Gajewski <maciej.gajewski0@gmail.com>:
>> > Thanks for checking the patch!
>> >
>> > So what's left to fix?
>> > * Moving the escaping-related functions to separate module,
>> > * applying your corrections.
>> >
>> > Did I missed anything?
>> >
>> > I'll submit corrected patch after the weekend.
>> >
>> > M
>> >
>
>