Re: review: pgbench progress report improvements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: review: pgbench progress report improvements
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRCMdr9O0Etwna6LC96EzFbpP+GYON1mYjZ9139amT-sfA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: review: pgbench progress report improvements  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Ответы Re: review: pgbench progress report improvements  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
<p dir="ltr"><br /> Dne 12. 9. 2013 17:34 "Fabien COELHO" <<a
href="mailto:coelho@cri.ensmp.fr">coelho@cri.ensmp.fr</a>>napsal(a):<br /> ><br /> ><br /> >> * patched
withminor warning<br /> ><br /> ><br /> >> some minor issue:<br /> >><br /> >> patch warning<br
/>>><br /> >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pavel/src/postgresql/config'<br /> >>
[pavel@localhostpostgresql]$ patch -p1 < pgbench-measurements-v2.patch<br /> >> (Stripping trailing CRs from
patch;use --binary to disable.)<br /> >> patching file contrib/pgbench/pgbench.c<br /> >> (Stripping
trailingCRs from patch; use --binary to disable.)<br /> >> patching file doc/src/sgml/pgbench.sgml<br /> ><br
/>><br /> > I cannot reproduce these warnings:<br /> ><br /> >   postgresql> git branch test<br /> >
 postgresql> git checkout test<br /> >     Switched to branch 'test'<br /> >   postgresql> patch -p1 <
../pgbench-measurements-v2.patch<br/> >     patching file contrib/pgbench/pgbench.c<br /> >     patching file
doc/src/sgml/pgbench.sgml<br/> ><p dir="ltr">it can depends on o.s. I did tests on Fedora 14. and for patching
withoutwarning I had to use dos2unix tool.<p dir="ltr">> Some details:<br /> ><br /> >   postgresql> patch
--version<br/> >     patch 2.6.1 [...]<br /> >   postgresql> sha1sum ../pgbench-measurements-v2.patch<br />
>    f095557ceae1409d2339f9d29d332cefa96e2153 [...]<br /> ><br /> > -- <br /> > Fabien.<br /> 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: getting rid of maintainer-check
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: review: pgbench progress report improvements