Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table

On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 08:15:06AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> So how about the attached version?

+1

I found a few issues.

\dP+ didn't work.  Fix attached.

+static const SchemaQuery Query_for_list_of_partitioned_relations = {                                                                             
+       .catname = "pg_catalog.pg_class c",                                                                                                       
+       .selcondition = "c.relkind = " CppAsString2(RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE),                                                                   

=> Should it be called Query_for_list_of_partitioned_tables ?  Or should
c.relkind match indices, too ?

On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 01:36:23AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Maybe the only behavior change I'd do to the submitted patch is to have
> \dP show both tables and indexes, while \dPt shows only tables and \dPi
> shows only indexes.  Maybe have \dPti show both tables and indexes? (
> identical to \dP)  That would be consistent with \d itself.

I think there's an issue with showing indices.  You said that \dP should be
same as \dPti, no?  Right now, indices are not shown in \dP, unless a pattern
is given.  I see you add that behavior in the regression tests; is that really
what's intended ?  Also, right now adding a pattern affects how sizes are
computed, I don't see why that's desirable or, if so, how to resolve that
inconsistency, or how to document it.

Justin