Re: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRBB7o0Z8zV9Ex+VAxGtxt7GFi3otbCk0aA_FD76aJe33g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Ответы Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Hi

čt 7. 3. 2019 v 8:03 odesílatel David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> napsal:
On 2/4/19 8:12 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>   attached rebased patch

This patch has gone through a few iterations but I don't think there's
any agreement on what it should look like.  There's been no code review
that I can see.

I think this should be pushed to PG13 at the least, perhaps returned
with comment or rejected.

This patch is in this moment in this form interesting just for plpgsql_check's users.

I cannot to move forward without this functionality .. I have a promise of review by some people from big company that uses plpgsql_check, but if there is not interest from commiter's side, then it is not time for pushing this patch today.

On second hand, the proposed syntax is same like for autonomous transactions, so I believe, so this patch will come in few years.

Please, wait few week, and then it can be rejected.

Regards

Pavel


 

Regards,
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Ltree syntax improvement
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participatein comparisons