Re: [HACKERS] proposal: session server side variables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: [HACKERS] proposal: session server side variables
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRApN4Ybqcs9uaK89Zo1ew_zDLk6uG6wiLYx0+g2WgQ1BQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] proposal: session server side variables  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] proposal: session server side variables  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


2017-02-01 6:05 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> There is no code yet. Code review and testing is where things get firmer.
>
> My personal stance right now is that I'd like to see catalog-decared typed
> variables. I would prefer them to be transactional and would at least oppose
> anything that didn't allow future room for that capability. I'd prefer that
> non-transactional vars be clearly declared as such.
>
> In the end though... I'm not the one implementing it. I can have some
> influence through the code review process. But it's whoever steps up with a
> proposed implementation that has the biggest say. The rest of us can say yes
> or no to some degree... but nobody can make someone else implement something
> they don't want.

The last patch is from the 6th of December and does not apply anymore:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRA9w_AujBAYdLR0UVfXwwoxhmn%2BFbNHnD3_NL%3DJ9x3y8w%40mail.gmail.com
I don't have a better idea than marking this patch as "returned with
feedback" for now, as the thread has died 3 weeks ago as well.

There is not a agreement on the form of session variables. 

Regards

Pavel
 
--
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Cache Hash Index meta page.
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: recursive json_populate_record()