st 7. 8. 2019 v 18:39 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > st 7. 8. 2019 v 17:39 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal: >> I wouldn't trust that. You don't really know what the lifespan of >> a fn_extra cache is.
> fn_extra cache cannot be longer than query.
There are fn_extra caches that are not tied to queries. Admittedly they're for special purposes like I/O functions and index support functions, and maybe you can assume that your function can't be used in such ways. I don't think it's a great programming model though.
> And if I understand well, then > is not possible to change parameter types inside query?
Most places dealing with composite types assume that the rowtype *could* change intraquery. I believe this was a live possibility in the past, though it might not be today. (The issue was inheritance queries, but I think we now force tuples from child tables to be converted to the parent rowtype. Whether that's 100% bulletproof is unclear.) If you're not dealing with composites then it's an okay assumption. I think.