Re: group by query plan on already clustered index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: group by query plan on already clustered index
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRA_EK+DUT_8x7t-V8sE0gFzCOwqiyOy5vd=N=utaFX2nw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на group by query plan on already clustered index  (Sandeep Gupta <gupta.sandeep@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Hello

2013/7/25 Sandeep Gupta <gupta.sandeep@gmail.com>:
> On a table T with two fields, f1 and f2, the sql command
>
> select count(f2), f1
> from  T
> group by f1
>
> result is seq scan followed by a sort on f1 (see the query plan below):
>
>    GroupAggregate  (cost=21566127.88..22326004.09 rows=987621 width=8)
>    ->  Sort  (cost=21566127.88..21816127.88 rows=100000000 width=8)
>          Sort Key: pid
>          ->  Seq Scan on tc  (cost=0.00..1442478.00 rows=100000000 width=8)
>
>
> However, the table is already has clustered index on f1.  My question is why
> doesn't
> postgres simply scan the table and compute the group? Why it needs to sort
> on f1 again?
> How can I force postgres to use the clustered index for group by?
>

PostgreSQL doesn't support index organized tables. Statement CLUSTER
doesn't ensure order of heap for ever. After any INSERT, UPDATE you
can lost a order.

So every time, you have to check order.

PostgreSQL 9.2 support a index only scan - but it is not used in your plan.

Regards

Pavel Stehule




>
> Thanks.
> Sandeep
>
>


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why are stored procedures looked on so negatively?
Следующее
От: bricklen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rule Question