Hello
2013/7/3 David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com>:
> I am using a DO$$ $$ block to emulate something that admittedly may be
> standard practice to accomplish using psql but for which I am using a less
> capable UI.
>
> Anyway, the basic form is:
>
> DO $$
> DECLARE some_var varchar := 'value';
> BEGIN
>
> UPDATE ..... WHERE col = some_var;
> UPDATE ..... WHERE col = some_var;
>
> RETURN;
> END;
> $$
>
> Now because of the DO I have no idea how many records were affected for each
> of the UPDATE statements. I am thinking that, either at the statement-level
> or even somehow defined inside the DO, some way to have the system
> automatically echo the usual "0 records updated" message out of the DO.
>
> i.e., UPDATE (VERBOSE) .... SET id = some_var;
>
> GET DIAGNOSTICS obviously works, and for a stored function is probably the
> better option, but for a simple DO oriented script command it is quite
> verbose.
>
> There is a prior discussion (somewhere) regarding using STRICT without
> RETURNING in similar situations to easily define when only one (and only
> one) record is expected to be affected. This thought falls into the same
> usability category.
>
> Thoughts?
I dislike this proposal
syntax is common for DO and functions, and it is useless there.
Probably we can enhance a messages in DEBUG level (or we can create a
new level of debug notices for this purposes).
I am afraid, there is no some workaround :(
Regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> David J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Idea-Statement-Echo-in-DO-tp5762454.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general