pg_sleep_enhancements.patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема pg_sleep_enhancements.patch
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRABP5EkzV1L099M6ujJTVo0k6_0RufXZ2p_Lnpt_Vm7Ug@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: pg_sleep_enhancements.patch  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
a) pg_sleep_for - no objection - it is simple and secure

b) pg_sleep_until

I am not sure - maybe this implementation is too simply. I see two possible risk where it should not work as users can expect

a) what will be expected behave whem time is changed - CET/CEST ?

b) what will be expected behave when board clock is not accurate and it is periodically fixed (by NTP) - isn't better to sleep only few seconds and recalculate sleeping interval?

Regards

Pavel

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: FOREIGN KEY ... CONCURRENTLY
Следующее
От: Christian Kruse
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)