> > So now if we have such a functionality then it would be even better to
> > extend it to selectively sync the slot. For example, if there is some
> > issue in syncing all slots, maybe some bug or taking a long time to
> > sync because there are a lot of slots but if the user needs to quickly
> > failover and he/she is interested in only a couple of slots then such
> > a option could be helpful. no?
> >
>
> I see your point but not sure how useful it is in the field. I am fine
> if others also think such a parameter will be useful and anyway I
> think we can even extend it after v1 is done.
>
Okay, I am fine with that.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com