Re: Make default subscription streaming option as Parallel
| От | Dilip Kumar |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Make default subscription streaming option as Parallel |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFiTN-umjpfJsp8tzTtjOSiodDXUxe6kP3nKTqQsdjoCEnHygw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Make default subscription streaming option as Parallel (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Make default subscription streaming option as Parallel
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:38 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> With parallel streaming as default, do you think there is a need to
> increase the default for 'max_logical_replication_workers' as IIUC
> parallel workers are taken from the same pool.
>
Good question. But then one may say that we should proportionately
increase max_worker_processes as well. I don't know what should be
reasonable new defaults. I think we should make parallel streaming as
default and then wait for some user feedback before changing other
defaults.
I agree, actually streaming of in progress transactions is a useful feature for performance in case of large transactions, so it makes sense to make it "on" by default. So +1 from my side.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: